Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, on Monday declined to open his defence in the terrorism case against him, insisting that the charges have no foundation in Nigerian law.
Kanu, who recently dismissed his legal team and opted to represent himself, told the Federal High Court in Abuja that a review of his case file revealed “no charge” recognized by any existing statute.
“I should not enter any defence in a charge that does not exist under any law in Nigeria. I urge you to release me today or grant me bail,” he said, adding that he is being held on a “fraudulent charge” the Supreme Court had previously faulted.
Presiding judge, Justice James Omotosho, clarified that once the prosecution closes its case, a defendant must either make a no-case submission, open a defence, or rely solely on the prosecution’s evidence. He warned Kanu of the legal risks of refusing to defend himself.
“It is my duty to explain these procedures, especially since you have no legal representation,” the judge stated, urging him to seek counsel experienced in criminal trials.
However, Kanu maintained his stance and pressed for an immediate release or bail on health grounds.
Lead government counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), argued that by refusing to present a defence, the defendant has effectively chosen to rely on the prosecution’s case and urged the court to proceed to judgment.
Justice Omotosho, noting the peculiarity of Kanu’s self-representation, instead granted a final window for the defendant to reconsider.
He adjourned proceedings to November 4, 5, and 6, giving Kanu seven days to consult lawyers and decide whether to enter a defence. Should he persist in declining, the court will receive final written addresses on November 6 and move toward judgment.
